The Memory Project and the Bombing Campaign Debate
The Memory Project: Stories of the Second World War Digital Archive has the very real potential to play a vital role in the debates surrounding the 1939-45 conflict. Perhaps the most highly charged of these surrounds the Allied bombing campaign – even the most lackadaisical Internet search on the subject will turn up references to the “Death by Moonlight” episode of the CBC docudrama The Valour and the Horror and the recent controversy surrounding the War Museum exhibit on the subject, to name only Canadian examples – a campaign in which Canadian personnel played a disproportionate role.
By interviewing Second World War veterans individually, The Memory Project allows the actual participants in these events to share their thoughts on this issue in a direct and easy-to-consult format. And they have not hesitated to do so. All of the Bomber Command flight crew members whom I have spoken with raised the topic of the morality of bombing and how they are perceived by the wider public on their own initiative. This group so far consists of only four people among the over 100 Second World War veterans I have interviewed since joining the project, but that seemingly tiny number belies the eloquence of those interviewees, and my experiences were powerful enough to prompt this writing.
Of course, those interviews, which averaged a little less than an hour in length, were edited down to the 6-9 minute clip which appears on our digital archive. Admittedly, these edits reflect my biases, but in each case the passion brought out by the individual comments on the bombing debate insured that the clips concerning that subject were selected, regardless of my personal opinion about what was stated.
This is just another example of the many ways that The Memory Project: Stories of the Second World War helps grant veterans the opportunity to share their perspectives on the issues that matter to them.
Andrew Theobald, PH.D.

Comments
I have interviewed more veterans -and even flown with over 100 veterans of the bomber campaign post-war -and would like to compare notes.
Of course none of my "subjects" were actors from the "Valour and the Horror" travesty -they were actual participants in the campaign!
While I appreciate "eloquence" -we must remember that now these veterans average around 90 years of age. We would be remiss if we considered that possession of a silver tongue at 90+ is a credential that over-rides wartime experience at 20 -25.
I have yet to meet a Bomber Command veteran who regrets his contribution to Allied victory in WW2. They may regret the loss of civilian life -but they accept it as part of the price which had to be paid.
Had we not caused grievous loss to both the Germans and the Japanese -do you seriously doubt that the war would not still be raging?
How would you suggest that we should have convinced them that they were beaten? Skywriting?
Jock Williams Yogi 13
The purpose of my post was to draw attention to the fact that the interviews with Bomber Command veterans that appear on The Memory Project website (http://www.thememoryproject.com/home.aspx) stand out for their unprompted statements about what I called the bombing campaign debate. My own opinion on this subject is much less important, although I agree that Death by Moonlight is best described as a “travesty”. Nevertheless, the works of authors such as Earl Beck and A.C. Grayling provide perspective that only enriches the historiography: the oral history of veterans and the scholarship of historians can and should complement each other.
Two representative examples of interviews with Bomber Command veterans are Ernest Peter Bone (http://www.thememoryproject.com/Stories/Veteran-Profile.aspx?itemid=1059) and Joseph Friedman (http://www.thememoryproject.com/Stories/Veteran-Profile.aspx?itemid=1299). New interviews are also regularly posted to our website.